"Country Doctor"

JOIN CDA     NEWS INDEX       POLITICS      DISPENSING      EDUCATION      FEATURES     BOOKS     SMALL ADS     GP FEES    LIGHT BITES LINKS     FEEDBACK


NICE business
and colon cancer therapy
 
FRONT PAGE

 

 

100th NICE technology appraisal guidance offers new hope for people with colon cancer

 

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has today published its 100th technology appraisal guidance. The guidance to the NHS in England and Wales on the use of capecitabine and oxaliplatin for the adjuvant treatment of patients with stage III (Dukes’ C)* colon cancer following surgery for the condition, recommends that the drugs should be considered as options for the adjuvant treatment of patients as follows:

            • capecitabine as monotherapy

            • oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid.

The guidance recommends that the choice of adjuvant treatment should be made jointly by the patient and their doctor. The patient should be informed about the differences between the medicines available and the potential contraindications and side effects so that she or he can be fully involved in the decision.

Andrew Dillon, Chief Executive, said: “The NHS cares for millions of patients each year with a wide range of potentially life threatening conditions - heart disease, diabetes, respiratory disease, serious injuries – and all these patients should have access to the best treatments. Resources are limited, so NICE weighs up what the evidence tells us about treatments to make sure that taxpayers’ money is spent on those that will have the most benefit for patients. It is right that this is done with careful thought and consideration.

The guidance we have issued today, in common with the 99 that have preceded it, was developed following a rigorous assessment of the available evidence through a transparent and inclusive process that is held up as an example of excellence worldwide. Since our inception in April 1999 we have issued 59 pieces of appraisal guidance on cancer, more than for any other disease area. This guidance, which benefits many thousands of patients each year, covers drugs for a wide range of cancers, including breast, ovarian, lung and bowel; standards on how services for blood, urological and skin cancers, to name a few, should be delivered; and guidelines for GPs on referring people with suspected cancer to specialist services to ensure rapid diagnosis and treatment.”

He continued: Colon cancer is one of the most common cancers, affecting around 30,000 people each year. This appraisal is another example of NICE working to ensure that new treatments that are clinically and cost effective are made available to patients across the NHS. Today’s guidance sits alongside existing NICE guidance on the use of drugs to treat this condition and improves the options available to people with cancer. These drugs are not a cure but they can improve quality of life and increase progression free survival, and as such they are an important addition to the treatment options available to people with this cancer.”

*A method of staging how far the cancer has spread. Stage III (or Dukes’s C) refers to people whose colon cancer has spread to between 1 and 4 nearby lymph nodes but has not spread to any other part of the body.

 

For more information call Phil Ranson on 0207 067 5904 or 07786 390068

 

About NICE

1.       The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) is the independent organisation responsible for providing national guidance on the promotion of good health and the prevention and treatment of ill health.

2.       NICE produces guidance in three areas of health:

  • public health – guidance on the promotion of good health and the prevention of ill health for those working in the NHS, local authorities and the wider public and voluntary sector
  • health technologies – guidance on the use of new and existing medicines, treatments and procedures within the NHS
  • clinical practice – guidance on the appropriate treatment and care of people with specific diseases and conditions within the NHS.

3.       Its predecessor, the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (also known as NICE), was set up as part of the Government's commitment to delivering a modern and dependable NHS to help health professionals in the National Health Service give their patients the best possible healthcare within the resources available.

4.       In April 2005, the functions of another NHS organisation, the Health Development Agency (HDA), were transferred to NICE. Now called the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, NICE’s new role was set out in the 2004 White Paper ‘Choosing health: making healthier choices easier’. In it the government set out key principles for helping people make healthier and more informed choices about their health.

5.       At the time of its establishment critics mused that NICE had been set up to ration on behalf of the NHS. NICE has always been clear that its job is to inform the NHS about whether a drug works well enough to justify its cost by considering in full the evidence of both clinical and cost effectiveness and that its guidance would in fact promote the faster uptake and more equitable access to effective treatments (put an end to postcode prescribing) – that is put a rationale into the use of resources.

 

100 technology appraisals

6.       The Institute published its first full technology appraisal guidance – on the removal of wisdom teeth, in April 2000.

7.       Since then, the Institute has published, on average, 14 technology appraisals each year, covering new drugs and treatments across all the major disease areas.

8.       The Institute has produced appraisals ranging from the artificial joints used in hip replacement surgery; surgical treatment for hernias; drugs for a variety of cancers; treatments for smoking cessation; drugs and surgery for obesity; drugs to treat bipolar disorder and many more.

9.       The 100 technology appraisal guidance include 195 different drugs, 113 medical devices, 1 health promotion, 17 diagnostic and 56 clinical procedures – for 79 different conditions. It is estimated that the recommendations in the guidance have the potential to impact on the lives of 27,855,062 patients.

10.   The majority of NICE recommendation have suggested partial or full use of technologies, specifically 29 technologies have been recommended for routine use (all of their licensed indications), 63 for selective use (groups have been identified where the technologies are most effective) and 8 for use in research settings only.

11.   As NICE predicted the appraisal process has developed over the past 7 years:

  • in line with NICE’s original intentions all consultation takes place in the public domain – consultation documents are published on the NICE web site alongside full details of the appraisal and who’s involved
  • Meetings are now held with all stakeholder groups
  • Consultations on the assessment report
  • The addition of non-appellant commentators such as the British
  • National Formulary
  • Addition of NHS Primary Care Trusts ( England ) and Local Health Groups ( Wales ) as Consultees with Appeal rights.
  • Appeals now held in public

12.   In response to concerns from stakeholders NICE developed a rapid process for assessing drugs. The Single Technology Appraisal (STA) process will be used initially to produce faster guidance on life-saving drugs which have already been licensed and on new medicines close to when they first become available. The new process will enable single new drugs, and existing drugs with new indications to be rapidly assessed.

 

Transparency of decision-making * [See the item by the Parliamentary Information Commissioner entitled "NICE secrecy is questioned..." at the end of this section]

13.   From the moment a topic is referred to NICE, information is published on the NICE website. The website contains:

  • information on the appraisal and appeal processes
  • details of the independent Appraisal Committee, including the minutes of the Committee meetings
  • details of the staff at NICE working on appraisals
  • information on the topics we are looking at, including the stakeholders who are involved, and the forward work plan (dates of meetings, planned issue dates, etc)
  • the scope (question being answered) for each technology under appraisal
  • the research protocol and details of the independent group conducting the research
  • the Appraisal Committee’s initial thoughts (Appraisal Consultation Document), on which those visiting the site can provide feedback
  • the independent Assessment Report
  • the Appraisal Committee’s final recommendations (Final Appraisal Document), at the same time as it is sent to stakeholders for appeal
  • full details of the outcome of appeals should they be held
  • the final guidance to the NHS and a public version of the guidance

NICE’s decisions in practice

14.   Although NICE guidance does not override the responsibility of healthcare professionals to make appropriate decisions on the circumstances of individual patients, they are expected to take the guidance fully into account when exercising their clinical judgement.

15.   From January 2002 onwards, the NHS in England and Wales has been required to provide funding for treatments and drugs recommended by the NICE technology appraisal process. This does not mean that treatment will be forced on a patient; it means that provided that the healthcare professional and patient feel that it is the right treatment for the individual, then the local NHS organisation is responsible for making funds available.

 

Appraisal guidance issued to date

No

Topic - summary

Routine/ selective/ research

Estimated population per year

1.     1   

Wisdom Teeth Removal

Selective

53,000

2.     2 

Hip joints for replacement surgery

Selective

37,800

3.     3  

Taxanes for Ovarian Cancer

Selective

4000

4.     4  

Coronary Artery Stents ischaemic heart disease

Selective

20,000

5.      5

Liquid Based Cytology – cervical cancer

Research

4 million

6.      6 

Taxanes for Breast Cancer

Selective

5000

7.       7

Proton Pump Inhibitors for dyspepsia

Selective

530,000

8.      8

Hearing Aids

Selective

1.4 million

9.      9 

Rosiglitazone for Type 2 Diabetes

Selective

72,800

10.    10

Inhaler systems for under 5s

Routine

No figure available

11.    11

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators for arrythmias

Selective

1800

12.    12

Glycoprotein IIb / IIIa inhibitors for acute coronary syndromes

Routine

37,950

13.    13

Methylphenidate for Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Routine

48,000

14.    14

Ribavirin and Interferon Alpha for Hepatitis C

Selective

7000

15.    15

Zanamivir (Relenza) for Influenza

Selective

97,000 to

487,000

16.    16

Autologous Cartilage transplantation in Knee Joints

Research

850

17.    17

Laparoscopic surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Research

No figure available

18.    18

Laparoscopic surgery for Inguinal Hernia

Selective

5,765

19.    19

Donepezil, Rivastigmine and Galantamine for Alzheimer’s disease

Selective

30,000

20.    20

Riluzole for Motor Neurone Disease

Routine

2000

21.    21

Pioglitazone for Type 2 Diabetes

Selective

72,800

22.    22

Orlistat for Obesity

Selective

22,000

23.    23

Temozolomide for Brain Cancer

Selective

150

24.    24

Difficult to heal surgical wounds

Routine

No figure available

25.    25

Gemcitabine for Pancreatic cancer

Selective

600 – 840

26.    26

Drugs for non-small cell lung cancer

Routine

1320 – 5280

27.    27

Cox IIs for Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis

Selective

1.4 million

28.    28

Topetecan for advanced Ovarian Cancer

Selective

1500

29.    29

Fludarabine for B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Routine

No figure available

30.    30

Taxanes for Breast Cancer – review

Selective

As for original guidance

31.    31

Sibutramine for Obesity in adults

Routine

45,000 after 3 years

32.    32

Beta interferon & glatiramer for MS

Research

30,000

33.    33

Drugs for Colorectal Cancer

Selective

15,152

34.    34

Tratuzumab breast cancer

Selective

450

35.    35

Enteracept juvenile arthritis

Selective

600

36.    36

Enteracept & infliximab rheumatoid arthritis

Selective

15,000

37.    37

Rituximab - lymphoma

Selective

9000

38.    38

Inhalers for children’s 5- 15 years

Routine

No figure available

39.    39

Zyban & Nicotine replacement therapy – smoking cessation

Routine

1.4 million

40.    40

Infliximab Crohn’s disease

Selective

1500 -4200

41.    41

Routine anti D rhesus negative women

Routine

105,000

42.    42

Human growth hormone - children

Routine

1740

43.    43

Atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia

Routine

210,000

44.    44

Metal on metal hip resurfacing

Selective

4500

45.    45

PLDH (Caelyx) for ovarian cancer

Selective

2000

46.    46

Surgery for morbid obesity

Selective

4000

(after 8 years)

47.    47

Glycoproteins (review) for acute coronary syndromes

Routine

No figure available

48.    48

Home vs hospital haemodialysis for end stage renal failure

Selective

5350

49.    49

Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous lines

Routine

No figure available

50.    50

Imatinib (Glivec) for Chronic myeloid leukaemia

Routine

2600

51.

Computerised Cognitive behavioural therapy

Research

No figure available

52.

Thrombolysis

Routine

240,000

53.

Long acting insulin analogues (glargine)

Selective

800,000

54.

Vinorelbine for breast cancer

Selective

33,000

55.

Paclitaxel – ovarian cancer

Routine

4000

56.

Tension free vaginal tape

Routine

No figure available

57.

Subcutaneous insulin infusion (insulin pumps)

Selective

1,000,000

58.

Zanamivir oseltamivir amantidine treatment of flu

Routine & no – hence tabled as selective

6000

59.

ECT

Selective

No figure available

60.

Patient education models diabetes

Routine

1,000,000

61.

Capecitabine & tegafur with uracil for metastatic colorectal cancer

Routine

28,200

62.

Capecitabine for locally advance breast cancer

Routine

33,000

63.

Glitazones for type 2 diabetes (review)

Selective

1,000,000

64.

Human Growth Hormone in adults

Selective

12,600

65.

Rituximab for aggressive non Hodgkin’s lymphoma

Selective

9000

66.

Olanzapine & valporate semisodium for bipolar 1 disorder

Routine

546,000

67.

Oseltamivir and amantidine for prophylaxis of flu

Routine & no – hence tabled as selective

6000

68.

PDT for macular degeneration

Selective

7500

69.

Use of liquid-based cytology for cervical screening

Routine

5820

70.

Use of imatanib for chronic myeloid leukaemia

Selective

1080

71.

Use of coronary artery stents

Selective

1,400,000

72.

Rheumatoid arthritis - anakinra

Research

400,000

73.

Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis and management of angina and myocardial infarction

Selective

1,200,000

74.

Pre-hospital initiation of fluid replacement therapy in trauma

Selective

14,500

75.

Hepatitis C - pegylated interferons, ribavarin and alfa interferon

Selective

50,000 – 500,000

76.

Newer drugs for epilepsy in adults

Selective

918,000

77.

Newer hypnotic drugs for insomnia

Selective

No figure available

78.

Fluid-filled thermal balloon and microwave endometrial ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding

Selective

1,500,000

79.

Newer drugs for epilepsy in children

Selective

300,000

80.

Acute coronary syndromes - clopidogrel

Routine

150,000

81.

Atopic dermatitis (eczema) - topical steroids

Selective

100,000

82.

Atopic dermatitis (eczema) - pimecrolimus and tacrolimus

Selective

3,300,000

83.

Hernia - laparoscopic surgery (review)

Selective

70,000

84.

Sepsis (severe) - drotrecogin

Routine

21,000

85.

Renal transplantation - immuno-suppressive regimens (adults)

Selective

13,900

86.

Gastro-intestinal stromal tumours (GIST) - imatinib

Selective

200 to 2000

87.

Secondary osteoporosis

Selective

2,000,000

88.

Dual-chamber pacemakers for the treatment of symptomatic bradycardia

Selective

16,000

89.

Cartilage injury - autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) (review) (No. 89)

Research

10,000

90.

Vascular disease - clopidogrel and dipyridamole

Selective

237,000

91.

Ovarian cancer (advanced) - paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and topotecan (review)

Selective

6000

92.

Tooth decay - HealOzone

Research

No figure available

93.

Colorectal cancer (advanced) - irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed (review)

Selective

30,000

94.

Cardiovascular disease - statins

Selective

238,000

95.

Arrhythmia - implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) (review)

Selective

50,000 – 70,000

96.

Hepatitis B (chronic) - adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alpha-2a

Selective

180,000

97.

Depression and anxiety - computerised cognitive behavioural therapy (CCBT)

Selective

362,335

98.

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) - methylphenidate, atomoxetine and dexamfetamine (review) (No. 98)

Selective

366,000

99.

Immunosuppressive therapy for renal transplantation in children and adolescents

Selective

13,900

100.

Capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the adjuvant treatment of stage III (Dukes’ C) colon cancer

Routine

7,800

Totals

Selective 63

     Routine   29

Research 8

 

27,855,062

 

 

*
NICE SECRECY IS QUESTIONED BY THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER

  Contact John Hemming MP: 07958 398 388

  John Hemming MP, working with the Alzheimer’s Society, has reported the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) to the Information Commissioner following secrecy over how decisions are made regarding the cost effectiveness of the only drugs for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease.

  NICE is preventing the public looking at the computer model prepared by Southampton Technology Assessment Centre that helps assess the cost effectiveness of these drugs. Without access to the model the public cannot fully understand how decisions on cost effectiveness are reached.

  John Hemming MP said: “It is vital that NICE is held accountable for the life and death decisions that they take, but how can we hold NICE to account when we don’t know how it measures the cost effectiveness of new drugs? It is simply not right that by signing a contract NICE can keep such important information like this secret.”

Those who might be denied access to these drugs on the NHS are right to demand to know why. I am grateful to the Information Commissioner for taking up this case, and I look forward to his conclusions.

Neil Hunt, chief executive of the Alzheimer’s Society, says,

NICE’s proposal to deny people in the early and late stages of Alzheimer’s disease access to effective drug treatments makes no sense. We fully support this information request. It is impossible to determine how NICE has made the decision that these drugs are not good value for money given the information that has been made publicly available. NICE’s judgments affects people lives, people have the right to know how it makes its decisions.

NICE is due to meet to decide the future of drug treatments for Alzheimer’s on 27th April.

 

 NOTES

  • Following John Hemming MP’s request for a copy of this model NICE replied saying “We consider the model to be exempt from disclosure under the [Freedom of Information] Act in accordance with section 41 because it was provided to the Institute in confidence by a third party and disclosure would constitute an actionable breach of confidence.”
  • The Information Commissioner is the independent arbiter of the Freedom of Information Act (2001). The Act is so new that there has never been a case of this kind before. Indeed, there has only ever been one case under section 41 of the Act, and in that case the Information Commissioner ruled in favour of the making the content of a contract between Derry City Airport and Ryanair for the use of its airport public, as well as how much Ryanair pay to Derry City Council for the use of its airport facilities.
  • The decisions was taken to the Information Commissioner following an exhaustion of NICE’s own appeals system. Possible outcomes include freeing up some parts of model but not others, or in allowing members of the public to see the model on the understanding that they make no financial gain from doing so.
  • Section 41 of the Freedom of Information Act 2001 is as follows:

41. -                (1) Information is exempt information if-

a). it was obtained by the public authority from any other person (including another public authority), and

b). the disclosure of the information to the public (otherwise than under this Act) by the public authority holding it would constitute a breach of confidence actionable by that or any other person.

(2) The duty to confirm or deny does not arise if, or to the extent that, the confirmation or denial that would have to be given to comply with section 1(1)(a) would (apart from this Act) constitute an actionable breach of confidence.

  • NICE, the government body which produces guidance on which drug treatments should be funded by the NHS, is carrying out an appraisal of the four drug treatments currently licensed for Alzheimer's disease (Aricept, Exelon, Reminyl and Ebixa). Nice issued a draft decision for consultation in March 2005, that proposed none of the four treatments should be funded by the NHS. It acknowledged that the drugs were clinically effective, but stated that they were not cost effective.  There was an unprecedented response to this guidance, with nearly 8,000 people with dementia, carers and professionals writing in to contest the decision. NICE considered this response and in July asked the pharmaceutical companies for more data. It has now issued a revised draft decision for consultation.

Tom Paul

Parliamentary Researcher

Office of John Hemming MP

 

t: 020 7219 4345

 

 (27/4/06)

 

 

Return to Headlines