"Country Doctor"

JOIN CDA     NEWS INDEX       POLITICS      DISPENSING      EDUCATION      FEATURES     BOOKS     SMALL ADS     GP FEES    LIGHT BITES LINKS     FEEDBACK

NICE? Blind and nasty.


                 HEADLINES

PATIENTS CONTINUE TO RISK BLINDNESS AS NICE RECOMMENDS ONLY SINGLE THERAPY IN LATEST AMD GUIDANCE

Second Appraisal Consultation Document fails to provide choice for patients and ophthalmologists

December 14 2007, London Pfizer Limited today expresses concern that the latest NICE appraisal consultation document (ACD) regarding the use of treatments for wet Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD), fails to provide any treatment choice for patients or physicians, by recommending only one anti-VEGF therapy for AMD.

NICE’s second ACD again fails to recommend Macugen® (pegaptanib) for patients affected by wet AMD in England and Wales, in stark contrast to Scotland where the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) approved its use.

Macugen works in a different, selective way to the sole recommended anti-VEGF treatment ranibizumab; like it, Macugen is licensed to treat all forms of wet AMD,1 and offers the potential to preserve the sight of those AMD patients for whom ranibizumab is clinically inappropriate. Without effective treatment for their AMD, these patients risk losing their sight.

Steve Winyard, Head of Public Policy at the Royal National Institute of Blind People (RNIB) commented: ‘We welcome NICE's proposed changes as a major way forward in providing treatment to thousands of people with wet AMD. However, we would like NICE to reconsider its recommendation not to allow the use of Macugen on the NHS. Doctors should be able to choose between the available licensed treatments, based on their clinical judgement of what is in the best interest of the individual patient. This is the position in Scotland and patients in England and Wales deserve no less.’

This view was echoed by Andrew Lotery, Professor of Ophthalmology at the University of Southampton , who commented: ‘In my opinion, both of the licensed anti-VEGF treatments should be made available to ophthalmologists. It should be at the discretion of the physician to decide which anti-VEGF medication is most clinically appropriate for a given patient.’

There are approximately 26,000 new cases of wet AMD in the UK each year 2 and AMD is the leading cause of sight-loss for people over the age of 50 in the Western world. 3  

 

Dr David Gillen, Medical Director at Pfizer Limited said: ‘Pfizer is extremely disappointed that this second ACD does not recommend the use of Macugen. Throughout the appraisal process Pfizer’s position has been clear – patients and their physicians should have a choice over which anti-VEGF treatment is appropriate for individual patients – one treatment does not fit all. Macugen has been shown to maintain vision in patients with all types of wet AMD and has a licence to reflect this. It is unacceptable that patients in England and Wales should still be denied the choices that patients in Scotland have.’

[Ed.:  The reason for this decision, as for many others in virtually every Department of State is the bumbling incompetence of the present Prime Minister during his ten years as Chancellor.  Why else would every department be tightening its belt trying to make ends meet?  Why else would Brown and his Chancellor be heaping one stealth tax on top of another and another and another?

Remember, last week he refused to fund breast cancer and prostate treatments.

Health is a high profile topic yet Brown really has to make cuts - even for cancer treatments.

Things must be bad - and how!]

 

References:

[1] Macugen Summary of Product Characteristics

2 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Appraisal Consultation Document (ranibizumab and pegaptanib for age-related macular degeneration); 14 July 2007.

3 AMD Alliance [Online]. Homepage – Age Related Macular Degeneration (cited 12 June 2007). Available from http://www.amdalliance.org/

 

 (20/12/07)